|
USU
Home / Intermountain
Herbarium /
Holdings
Intermountain Herbarium Holdings:
Types
Type
Specimens at UTC
Type specimens are the specimens that "anchor" the meaning
of a name. They can be considered voucher specimens for a name.
There are various classes of type specimens.
The most important are holotypes, lectotypes,
neotypes, and epitypes.
Syntypes are arguably the next most important,
followed by syntypes. Isotypes are duplicates
of a type specimen. One can be more specific and classify isotypes
as isolectorypes, isoneotypes, isosyntypes, etc. but we, along
with many other herbaria do not do so.
We are currently creating a database of our
type specimens, checking the class of each type. A preliminary
summary of the herbarium's holdings is presented in the following
table.
| |
Fungi |
Lichens |
Plants |
| Holotypes |
3 |
|
48 |
| Isotypes |
13 |
1 |
1042 |
| Paratypes |
84 |
|
127 |
NOTE: Fungal Paratypes are currently housed with the main fungal
collection.
Locality information of our type specimens is currently unavailable, but a current list (spreadsheet format is available).
Classes
of Type Specimens
Holotype: The person(s)
first proposing the name stated which specimen was to be regarded
as the type specimen. Current rules require that one state exactly
which specimens one means and identify the herbarium in which
it has been deposited.
Lectotype: The person(s)
who first proposed the name did not designate a type specimen
(this was legal prior to 1958) so someone else did so later. There
are (as you might expect) strong recommendations about how one
selects a lectotype. To find out more, consult the International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature.
Neotype: Sometimes holotypes
and lectotypes are lost or destroyed. The most notorious instance
of this was the desctruction of all the types in the Berlin herbarium
by allied bombing during World War II. When a holotype or lectotype
ihas been destroyed or lost, a replacement specimen can be designated
as the type specimen. The replacement type is called a neotype.
And yes, there are some recommendations as to how neotypes should
be selected.
Epitypes: Sometimes it
is found that the existing type of a name does not have the features
needed to distinguish it from other species. This happens sometimes
when the original type specimen was a drawing (no longer legal
except for fossils) or when it was not appreciated that what was
being called a single spcies is actually two or more different
species. In these circumstances, an epitype can be designated
for the existing name. It must be consistent with the original
use of the name. This then permits other specimens to be selected
as the types for other names. Obviously, the specimen selected
as an epitype should show all the characteristics currently used
to distinguish the taxon involved from the taxa with which it
had been confused.
Syntypes:In the bad old
days when it was not necessary to list an individual specimen
as a type, many taxonomists simply listed several specimens that
they considered should be called by their new name. These specimens
all have equal standing so far as being types are concerned and
are called syntypes. Syntypes are sometimes called cotypes.
Paratypes: If a taxonomist
lists several specimens as representing his new name but designates
one of these specimens as the holotype, the non-holotype specimens
are paratypes.
Isotypes: These are simply
duplicates of a type specimen. They become important if the holo-,
lecto-, neo-, or epitype is destroyed because they are the first
choice as a replacement type (a neoneotype? theoretically possible).
Topotypes: Specimens
collected from the same location as a type specimen. They have
no nomenclatural significance.
|