MANUAL OF GRASSES FOR THE
CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES AND CANADA
A
project funded by the Agricultural Research Service, United States Department
of Agriculture, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, and Utah State University
Newsletter 10
November
13, 1997
Despite intentions
to the contrary, it has been over a year since the last Manual Newsletter. It
has been an active year, one that has seen considerable progress and important
decisions being made. Because the decisions affect all aspects of the project,
we are presenting these before the progress report.
FORMAT
In the last
newsletter, we stated that the Manual would be coming out in parts. It
was Barkworth's impression that this was acceptable to the U.S.D.A. In February
of this year, she found out she was wrong. The Manual must come out as a
single volume. This has had a significant impact on our plans. In fairness to
the U.S.D.A. representatives, we had never formally requested the change in
publication plans to publication as a series.
PUBLISHER
The goal of the
U.S.D.A. in funding the Manual project has always been to provide an
affordable resource for grass identification, one that might reasonably be used
in agrostology classes. Given the price of textbooks nowadays, this could mean
up to $100, but not $300. After considering possible alternatives, the most
attractive is publishing the Manual as a document of the U.S.
Government. This alternative became available in the last few years as a result
of policy changes at some government level far above the Manual project.
Publication as a
U.S. government document has two major consequences. First, there can be no
profit made. The cost of the document must reflect the actual cost of
production, shipping, and handling, the price geared to recovery of these
costs, not making a profit. Second, U.S. government documents cannot be
copyrighted. If the project were designed to make money, the latter aspect
would be unappealing, but it is not.
The lack of
copyright means that the material in the Manual, including the
illustrations and distribution maps, can be used without even asking
permission. This does not, of course, remove the ethical obligation to
acknowledge one's source.
There is one
problem associated with the lack of copyright: in order not to lead people into
temptation, all the illustrations must either be original or redrawn
from non-copyrighted materials. Technically, some illustrations could retain
their copyright, but this would be annoying for would be users as well as
difficult to enforce. We are, therefore, seeking a level of funding that will
enable the Manual to be completely copyright free (see below).
File
availability. The decision to make the Manual completely copyright-free has led
to two other decisions. The first is the most significant. We have decided that
we will make the computer files themselves available in some easily accessible
format, probably Microsoft Wordâ for text material and Adobe PhotoShopâ for the line drawings and distribution maps, these being
the programs in use at the Intermountain Herbarium.
We are also
looking into making the distribution files that we have developed here
available, together with a runtime version of the mapping program we use
(currently ATLAS ver. 2, but ATLAS ver. 4 or ArcView-pc by the time of the next
newsletter). There are two files for each genus, one having county-level data
for the contiguous U.S., the other being location data. The location data are
tied to their source (e.g., a specimen or published map). The county data are
also connected to their source, but not so precisely.
The problem is
that some of the data were provided for use by the Manual project, but
not for general distribution. Out of respect for the work that goes into
developing such data, we must eliminate these records or provide a royalty to
the data providers before making our files available.
We would also like
to find a way to enable the maps to be updated. This will be a separate
project. One of the goals of the project design will be encouraging
participation by all herbaria and taxonomists in improving our knowledge
of grass distributions. We would also like to see contributors being given the
opportunity (but not the obligation) to maintain the records for
"their" genus. Clearly, these ideas bring up a host of issues, including
training and compensation. Reason enough to consider it a separate project!
CITATION
Technically
speaking, "North America" includes Greenland and much of Mexico. The Manual
has never included Mexico and, a year or so ago, we decided to exclude
Greenland. There were several reasons for doing so, one being that its flora is
currently being studied by taxonomists based at the University of Copenhagen,
another being that its inclusion increased the number of taxonomic problems
needing resolution. Given the need to wind up the Manual project, we
took the easy way out. This led to a reconsideration of the title of the Manual.
The change to
"Continental United States and Canada" provides a more accurate
description of its geographic scope. The United States is mentioned first
because the funding and most of the contributors are from the U.S. The change
from "of" to "for" indicates that some of the species are
introductions that have not become established in the region. The author
citation will be Barkworth, M.E., K.M. Capels, and L.A. Vorobik (Editors). The
remaining details will be decided at the time of publication.
INTERACTION
WITH FLORA NORTH AMERICA
Last summer, Dr.
David Murray contacted Barkworth to discuss how to develop a more productive
interaction between that project and the Manual project. As a result of
that, and subsequent discussions, Barkworth and Vorobik will be meeting with
representatives of FNA in St. Louis this December.
Everyone concerned
is agreed that collaboration is highly desirable. The purpose of the meeting is
to decide how we can do so most effectively. "Most effectively"
includes trying to minimize the demands placed on contributors while maximizing
the benefits of having two projects focussed on the same group of plants.
Once the Manual
is published, FNA will be able to use the files created for the Manual,
just as any other interested person or organization will be. The question is
whether there are some ways in which we could cooperate to get the Manual out
faster and the FNA volumes out more efficiently. All of which begs the question
of when the Manual will come out. On or before December 31, 1999.
Preferably before, as far before as possible.
We will keep you
informed about further developments. For now the most important aspect is that
collaboration between FNA and the Manual is being actively pursued.
PROGRESS
Text. We have complete treatments
for all but two genera, and these two are almost complete. Authors whose texts
have been through the full editing and revision process will shortly be
receiving a "final copy" of their treatment for a last check.
Progress on the other manuscripts is being made, but the longer manuscripts
take a lot of time. This also means that the process gets interrupted as other
critical deadlines come around.
Species order. Some contributors, despite
a request not to do so, have treated the species in alphabetical order. In such
instances, we are re-ordering the species to follow the key. This places
species with common keying characteristics together. This will help those of us
who like to look back and forth through illustrations of species similar to the
one that we have keyed out, just in case we made an error. It will also help
economize on illustrations.
We are adhering
rigidly to an average of 175 words for each species and generic description.
Keys and citations are excluded from the word count. There are two very simple
reasons for this limit, total length and cost. The Manual is going to be
a hefty piece of work, not one that one really wants to put in a backpack, but
we do need to keep its size under control. Cost is a factor because the paper
cost will be the most significant factor in determining the price of the Manual.
File
conversion. At
present, all our files are in WordStar for DOS. We have come to realize that we
shall need to convert them to a more widely used format for transmittal to a
page design program. We are fortunate in that Dr. Stephen Clyde of the Computer
Science Department at Utah State University has developed a macro that, in combination
with a WordStar Macro and Microsoft's WordStar conversion program, converts the
files, maintaining the formatting, indexing, and special characters. The
indexing will still need some work, but it will not be necessary, as we had
feared it would be, to reenter every indexed phrase. The formatting of the keys
will also need to be corrected, but this will occur in the page design phase
rather than in the document conversion phase.
Synonymy. We are planning to publish
the synonymy for the Manual in 1998. Contributors will be given a chance
to review their genus before it is published. Initially we were thinking of
making the synonymy available solely as a compact disk but, in response to a
few comments, we are looking into the cost of paper publication. The compact
disk version will be in a Microsoft Word file.
The synonymy is as
complete as we can make it. We went this route rather than a minimalist route
because many taxonomists do not have easy access to publications that those
working at major herbaria take for granted. We considered the Web as an
alternative means of presenting the synonymy, but the feedback we have received
is that people prefer something that is not Internet dependent. Access times
are often slow and, if one is not at an institution that picks up the cost
centrally, it can be expensive.
Our present
thinking is that the Manual itself will contain a compact disk of the
full synonymy, but that the index will provide information about names that are
not accepted in a manner similar to that in Flora Europaea. The citation
for the synonymy publication will be:
Capels, K.M. and
M.E. Barkworth (Editors). 1998. Names applied to grasses found in the
continental United States and Canada. Intermountain Herbarium, Utah State
University, Logan, Utah.
Contributors will
appreciate the appropriateness of listing Capels as senior editor for this
publication.
IIlustrations. Vorobik has started
working on the illustrations. In order to complete them within two years, she has
recruited some other botanical artists to assist her, but she will be the
illustration editor for the Manual, i.e., she is overseeing all the
illustration work.
Vorobik uses the
identification keys to guide her in selecting the features to illustrate.
Whenever feasible, she is using the illustrations in Hitchcock's
Manual as a starting point, supplementing them as needed to show the diagnostic
features used in the keys.
To ensure the
accuracy of the illustrations, Vorobik needs 2-3 representative herbarium
specimens for each taxon illustrated (which will be all except those
infraspecific taxa that differ only in length measurements from each other). In
some instances, e.g., large genera or genera in which significant taxonomic
changes have occurred, we shall be asking the contributor's assistance in
obtaining such specimens. All specimens consulted in preparing the
illustrations will be annotated. Contributors will be asked to comment on
pencil versions of the illustrations for their taxa.
Distribution
maps. We
have begun collecting and integrating data from Canadian sources, plus some
revisionary treatments. These are, in some instances, significantly modifying
the information that we have received from a contributor.
We recognize that
the time and cost involved in borrowing enough specimens to determine the
distribution of a species is often beyond a contributor's resources. The
approach we are taking will help ensure more accurate distributional data than
would otherwise be available. We ask that contributors look at the maps we send
to determine whether some of the records are likely to have been based on
misidentified specimens or a different interpretation of a species.
We shall give preference
to a contributor's map in developing the maps for the Manual, but shall
also allow contributors to say "Use the one that you have developed".
The pair of maps shown will indicate why we think that this may be the
preferred option in some instances. They are for a well-known species that has
not undergone any changes in its circumscription.
We shall only be
publishing maps for species, not infraspecific taxa. The reason is quite
simple: most published sources do not provide information about infraspecific
taxa.
We are very
grateful to the many individuals and institutions that have provided
distributional data to the Manual project. A complete listing will be
included in the front of the Manual.
Project
completion
We have to provide
the U.S.D.A. with a completed text manuscript for the Manual on January
30, 1998. We shall. It will not be ready for publication, i.e., there are still
questions embedded in some treatments and some have not yet been fully edited,
but we do have text for each genus and keys to the tribes and genera.
During the past
few months, we have been determining exactly what is needed to complete the
project, and how much it will cost. We are determined that it will be completed
before the end of 1999, but this will require some additional funding. We have
begun seeking this funding. We are assuming that, should we succeed in doing
so, we shall be allowed to see the Manual through to completion.
Among the tasks
that remain to be completed are a) conversion of all the files to Windows-based
programs, b) preparation of the glossary c) development of an integrated index,
d) editing of some of the larger manuscripts, and e) completion and printing of
the maps. Then all the disparate files have to be integrated into a single
product.
The last sentence
means that page design has to be completed, a not inconsiderable task. We are
convinced that we can raise the needed funds for completing this project and
that the resulting product will be an invaluable resource for those working
with grasses, not only in the continental United State and Canada but
throughout the world.
Please send
comments or questions to:
Drs. Mary E. Barkworth and Kathleen M.
Capels
Intermountain
Herbarium, Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5305
Voice 435-797-1584;
FAX 435-797-1575; Email: stipoid@cc.usu.edu
Contributors | Editors | Funding | Home Page | Names | Geography | You can help | Other